# Section 13 Factors

In this section we will learn how to fit linear models when some or all
of the inputs are categorical. Such inputs are sometimes called “factors”.
These can be
binary (*e.g.* sex recorded as male/female)
or ordered (*e.g.* quality recorded as poor/medium/good)
or unordered (*e.g.* marital status recorded as single/married/divorced/widowed).

## 13.1 Indicator Variables

Our aim here is to include categorical input variables within the usual regression model \[\begin{equation*} y = X\beta + \varepsilon. \end{equation*}\]

Assume that \(x_j \in \{a_1, \ldots, a_k\}\) is a factor which has \(k\) possible
values. The possible values of the factor, \(a_1, \ldots, a_k\) are also called
the **levels** of the factor. The easiest way to include a factor in a
regression model is via **indicator variables**. For this we represent \(x_j\)
using \(k-1\) columns in the design matrix, say \(\tilde x_1, \ldots, \tilde x_{k-1}\), where
\[\begin{equation*}
\tilde x_{\ell i}
= \begin{cases}
1 & \mbox{if $x_{ji} = a_\ell$ and} \\
0 & \mbox{otherwise,}
\end{cases}
\end{equation*}\]
for all \(\ell \in \{1, \ldots, k-1\}\) and \(i \in \{1, \ldots, n\}\).
Using this convention, \(x_{ji} = k\) is represented by setting
\(\tilde x_{1,i} = \cdots = \tilde x_{k-1,i} = 0\). The value \(a_k\)
which is not represented as a separate column is called the
**reference level**. The regression coefficients corresponding to the
columns \(\tilde x_1, \ldots, \tilde x_{k-1}\) can be interpreted
as the effect of level \(a_\ell\), relative to the effect
of level \(a_k\). Since the indicator is constant \(1\) for all samples
corresponding to a given factor, regression coefficients representing factors
lead to changes of the intercept, rather than of slopes.

We are using only \(k-1\) columns to represent a factor with \(k\) levels in order to avoid collinearity. If we would use \(k\) columns, defined as above, we would get \[\begin{equation*} \sum_{\ell=1}^k \tilde x_{\ell i} = \mathbf{1}, \end{equation*}\] and in a model with an intercept we would have exact collinearity of the corresponding columns in the design matrix \(X\) and thus the matrix \(X^\top X\) would not be invertible.

**Example 13.1 **Consider a dataset consisting of a numerical input variable
and a binary factor for gender (`female`

, `male`

).
Assume we are given data
\((1, \mathrm{male})\), \((2, \mathrm{female})\), \((3, \mathrm{female})\).
Then we can encode this data using the following design matrix:

intercept | \(x_1\) | \(1_\mathrm{\{female\}}(x_2)\) |
---|---|---|

1 | 1 | 0 |

1 | 2 | 1 |

1 | 3 | 1 |

In R there is a dedicated type `factor`

for categorical variables.
If factors appear in the input of linear regression problem, the
function `lm()`

will automatically create the indicator variables
for us.

**Example 13.2 **Here we simulated data which could describe the effect of some
medical treatment.
In the simulated data we have two groups, one which has been “treated”
and a control group. There is a “value” which decreases with age,
and is lower for the group which has been treated (the intercept is 10
instead of 12).

```
age1 <- runif(25, 18, 40)
group1 <- data.frame(
value=10 - 0.2 * age1 + rnorm(25, sd=0.5),
age=age1,
treated="yes")
age2 <- runif(25, 18, 80)
group2 <- data.frame(
value=12 - 0.2 * age2 + rnorm(25, sd=0.5),
age=age2,
treated="no")
data <- rbind(group1, group2)
data$treated <- factor(data$treated, levels = c("no", "yes"))
```

The last line of the code tells R explicitely that the `treated`

column
represents a factor with levels “no” and “yes”. Internally, this column will
now be represented by numbers 1 (for “no”) and 2 (for “yes”), but this numeric representation
is mostly hidden from the user. Now we fit a regression model:

```
Call:
lm(formula = value ~ ., data = data)
Residuals:
Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
-0.79290 -0.34713 0.00306 0.27912 0.87796
Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
(Intercept) 12.153307 0.228112 53.28 <2e-16 ***
age -0.206132 0.004929 -41.82 <2e-16 ***
treatedyes -1.836509 0.145201 -12.65 <2e-16 ***
---
Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
Residual standard error: 0.4336 on 47 degrees of freedom
Multiple R-squared: 0.9756, Adjusted R-squared: 0.9746
F-statistic: 941.1 on 2 and 47 DF, p-value: < 2.2e-16
```

We see that R used “no” as the reference factor, here. The
regression coefficient `treatedyes`

gives the relative change
of the “yes”, compared to “no”. The true value is
the difference of the means: \(10 - 12 = -2\), and the estimated
value `-1.89`

is reasonably close to this. The fitted values
for this model are
\[\begin{equation*}
\hat y
= \begin{cases}
\beta_0 + \beta_1 x_1 & \mbox{if not treated, and} \\
(\beta_0 + \beta_2) + \beta_1 x_1 & \mbox{if treated}.
\end{cases}
\end{equation*}\]

To get a better idea of the model fit, we plot the data together with separate regression lines for “yes” (red) and “no” (black):

```
par(mfrow = c(1, 2))
plot(value ~ age, data = data,
col = ifelse(treated == "yes", "red", "black"))
# regression line for the reference level `treatment == "no"`
abline(a = coef(m)[1], b = coef(m)[2])
# regression line for the level `treatment = "yes"`:
# here we need to add the coefficient for `treatedyes`
# to the intercept
abline(a = coef(m)[1] + coef(m)[3], b = coef(m)[2], col="red")
legend("bottomleft", c("no", "yes"),
col = c("black", "red"), lwd = 2)
# also show a boxplot for comparison
boxplot(value ~ treated, data = data,
border = c("black", "red"))
```

We can see that the two regression lines, corresponding to the two levels are parallel. They have the same slope but different intercepts.

The last command shows a boxplot of `value`

for comparison.
The boxplot does not allow to conclude that the treatment had an effect,
whereas the linear model, which accounts for age, shows the effect
of the treatment as a difference in intercepts. The `***`

in the `treatedyes`

row of the `summary(m)`

output shows that the
difference in intercepts is statistically significant.

## 13.2 Interactions

In some situations, the strength of the dependency of the response \(y\) to an
input \(x_1\) might depend on another input, say \(x_2\). The simplest such
situation would be, if the coefficient \(\beta_1\), corresponding on \(x_1\) is
itself proportional to \(x_2\), say \(\beta_1 = \gamma x_2\). In this case we have
\(y = \cdots + \beta_1 x_1 = \cdots + \gamma x_1 x_2\). Traditionally, inputs
added to a model which are the product of two or more of the original inputs
are called **interactions**. As a general rule, an interaction is only included
if the “main effects” are also included in the model, so in any variable
selection procedure, we would not drop \(x_1\) or \(x_2\) if \(x_1 x_2\) is still in
the model. An exception to this is when one can directly interpret the
interaction term without the main effect.

In R, interactions (*i.e.* products of inputs) are represented by the
symbol `:`

and `*`

can be used to include two variables together with their
product. Note also, that if a variable is known to be a factor, and it is
included as an interaction term, then R will make sure to only remove the
interaction term in a backward variable selection procedure whilst the main
effects are also included.

**Example 13.3 **Consider the following toy dataset:

In `lm()`

and related functions we can write `x1:x2`

as a shorthand
for `I(x1*x2)`

. The column `x1:x2`

in the R output corresponds
to the mathematical expression \(x_1 x_2\).

```
(Intercept) x1 x1:x2
1 1 2 2
2 1 2 4
3 1 2 6
attr(,"assign")
[1] 0 1 2
```

We can write `x1*x2`

as a shorthand for the model with the
three terms `x1 + x2 + x1:x2`

:

```
(Intercept) x1 x2 x1:x2
1 1 2 1 2
2 1 2 2 4
3 1 2 3 6
attr(,"assign")
[1] 0 1 2 3
```

Interactions also work for factors. In this case, products with all of the corresponding indicator variables are added to the model. while the base effect of factor variables is to have different intercepts for the different groups, using interactions with a factor allows to have different slopes for the different groups.

**Example 13.4 **The classical example of an interaction is to consider how the
yield \(y\) of a crop is related to temperature \(x_1\) and rainfall \(x_2\).
All these variables are continuous, but we might categorize rainfall as “wet”
and “dry”. Then a simplistic view could be that, for high rainfall, the yield
will be positively correlated with temperature, whereas for low rainfall the
correlation may be slightly negative, because in hot weather, plants need more
water, and if it is very hot and dry, the plants may even die.

We generate a toy dataset in R to represent such a situation:

```
T <- runif(25, 15, 35)
wet <- data.frame(
yield=40 + 7*T + rnorm(25, sd = 10),
temperature=T,
rainfall="high")
T <- runif(25, 15, 35)
dry <- data.frame(
yield=120 - 2*T + rnorm(25, sd = 10),
temperature=T,
rainfall="low")
crops <- rbind(wet, dry)
crops$rainfall <- factor(crops$rainfall, levels = c("low", "high"))
```

Now we fit a model, including `temperature`

, `rainfall`

and
an interaction term:

```
Call:
lm(formula = yield ~ temperature * rainfall, data = crops)
Residuals:
Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
-22.719 -4.329 1.203 4.411 19.131
Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
(Intercept) 117.1264 7.9941 14.652 < 2e-16 ***
temperature -1.7670 0.3403 -5.193 4.59e-06 ***
rainfallhigh -79.8798 11.0669 -7.218 4.30e-09 ***
temperature:rainfallhigh 8.8469 0.4734 18.688 < 2e-16 ***
---
Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
Residual standard error: 8.931 on 46 degrees of freedom
Multiple R-squared: 0.9837, Adjusted R-squared: 0.9826
F-statistic: 923.8 on 3 and 46 DF, p-value: < 2.2e-16
```

The fitted values for this model are \[\begin{equation*} \hat y = \begin{cases} \beta_0 + \beta_1 x_1 & \mbox{for low rainfall, and} \\ (\beta_0 + \beta_2) + (\beta_1 + \beta_3) x_1 & \mbox{for high rainfall}. \end{cases} \end{equation*}\] Finally, we can generate a plot of the data together with the two regression lines.

```
plot(yield ~ temperature, data=crops,
col = ifelse(rainfall == "low", "black", "red"))
abline(a = coef(m)[1], b = coef(m)[2])
abline(a = coef(m)[1] + coef(m)[3], b = coef(m)[2] + coef(m)[4],
col="red")
legend("topleft", c("dry", "wet"),
col = c("black", "red"), pch = 1)
```

As expected, the two lines have different intercepts and different slopes.

**Summary**

- Indicator variables can be used to represent categorical inputs in linear regression models.
- The levels of a factor correspond to different intercepts for the regression line.
- If interaction terms are used, the levels also affect the slope.